Imagine yourself becoming a victim to flawed facial recognition and becoming a suspect to a crime you did not commit, were not in the vicinity of, and could not prove otherwise.
Episode #10-48 released on July 19, 2020
Watch on Youtube
Download MP3 Audio
Look, I understand that wearing a mask is uncomfortable, humid, and hot. Most of you will even try to seek medical exceptions for things that have nothing to do with a mask, considering the mask does not stop you from breathing and does help stop the spread of the Covid-19 virus. The thing is the government is telling you to do something that benefits us in more than one way. If we exclude the virus and remember that every government out there loves to control the people, we should definitely be wearing masks. Why you may ask? Government face tracking.
You see face tracking on a small sample group is typically accurate but as the sample size goes up, so does the chance for false positives. We all have doppelgangers out there and various groups of people are harder to tell apart for physiological reasons. Twins, triplets, etc. do, also, pose a serious false positive risk, too. This means that there is a potential that a camera, loaded with face recognition software, can identify the wrong person if the sample size is too large. It, also, means that we need to take a look at what forensic science thinks is the likelihood of a match in this and many other scenarios. You see, when forensic scientists are brought to court as expert witnesses, many of them will talk about the likelihood of a match within a given population. What they will not indicate is that it is possible that two people can match in a given population. And, while twins, triplets, etc. will start having slight differences occurring over time, what is the guarantee that software can tell them apart, if many of us have trouble doing just that. What is the guarantee that the software can tell you and your doppelgangers apart? What legal guarantees do we have from false imprison resulting from a false positive match resulting from face tracking?
If you spend enough time researching you will learn a great deal about conditions that allow a person to have two sets of DNA, you will learn about twins evading crimes because it was impossible to convict the guilty one without sentencing the innocent one. You will learn that fingerprints, toted as unique, are not as unique as forensic scientists state, but only less likely to reoccur in a specific population size. Consider that the chances for a fingerprint match are 1 in 64 billion, but the 8 billion people of the earth typically have ten fingers, and as the statistic relates to that individual finger, and we have roughly 80 billion fingers, then maybe there is a different finger that has the same pattern, or one matching so closely to be considered a match. It means that every science has a chance for false positives occurring.
So, what is the point of telling you all this? It is simple, I want you to blind the government. And do this while many groups out there are fight against face tracking, hide your face so no government can track you. The more people hide their face, the less data the governments of the world will have. The less tracking data they have, the less control they have on you. Because there is on invariable fact about life you need to know, you can only be yourself and have a unique identity if you live in a world with privacy. And that is the whole point of being human, being unique.
Look, I understand that wearing a mask is uncomfortable, humid, and hot. Most of you will even try to seek medical exceptions for things that have nothing to do with a mask, considering the mask does not stop you from breathing and does help stop the spread of the Covid-19 virus. The thing is the government is telling you to do something that benefits us in more than one way. If we exclude the virus and remember that every government out there loves to control the people, we should definitely be wearing masks. Why you may ask? Government face tracking.
You see face tracking on a small sample group is typically accurate but as the sample size goes up, so does the chance for false positives. We all have doppelgangers out there and various groups of people are harder to tell apart for physiological reasons. Twins, triplets, etc. do, also, pose a serious false positive risk, too. This means that there is a potential that a camera, loaded with face recognition software, can identify the wrong person if the sample size is too large. It, also, means that we need to take a look at what forensic science thinks is the likelihood of a match in this and many other scenarios. You see, when forensic scientists are brought to court as expert witnesses, many of them will talk about the likelihood of a match within a given population. What they will not indicate is that it is possible that two people can match in a given population. And, while twins, triplets, etc. will start having slight differences occurring over time, what is the guarantee that software can tell them apart, if many of us have trouble doing just that. What is the guarantee that the software can tell you and your doppelgangers apart? What legal guarantees do we have from false imprison resulting from a false positive match resulting from face tracking?
If you spend enough time researching you will learn a great deal about conditions that allow a person to have two sets of DNA, you will learn about twins evading crimes because it was impossible to convict the guilty one without sentencing the innocent one. You will learn that fingerprints, toted as unique, are not as unique as forensic scientists state, but only less likely to reoccur in a specific population size. Consider that the chances for a fingerprint match are 1 in 64 billion, but the 8 billion people of the earth typically have ten fingers, and as the statistic relates to that individual finger, and we have roughly 80 billion fingers, then maybe there is a different finger that has the same pattern, or one matching so closely to be considered a match. It means that every science has a chance for false positives occurring.
So, what is the point of telling you all this? It is simple, I want you to blind the government. And do this while many groups out there are fight against face tracking, hide your face so no government can track you. The more people hide their face, the less data the governments of the world will have. The less tracking data they have, the less control they have on you. Because there is on invariable fact about life you need to know, you can only be yourself and have a unique identity if you live in a world with privacy. And that is the whole point of being human, being unique.
Host : Steve Smith | Music : | Editor : Steve Smith | Producer : Zed Axis Dot Net